Characterizing and Matching 2n5457 jFET Transistors

If you’ll notice, there aren’t that many audio people doing general circuit design using jFET transistors outside of maybe playing with Mu-stages. And although it can almost be overlooked in some structures, the Common-Source jFET gain stage and other single-ended structures like it require knowledge of Vp (aka Vgs(off) or Vp) when optimizing for gain and headroom.

Of course, if we’re building a tube-preamp emulating overdriver circuit, where clipping distortion is the name of the game, this likely won’t matter so much. But if we want reasonable amounts of gain and headroom out of a Common-Source gain stage, or the most of it as possible, then we do need to know the value of this limiting constant. Many don’t realize that a jFET Common-Source stage cannot handle signals above |Vp| volts in amplitude // actually, that’s one way to estimate Vp. All this then may serve to explain why the Common-Source jFET circuit is not as widely used in audio as its BJT Common-Emitter counterpart. Depending on the situation, proper use of a jFET transistor might well require sufficient characterization before hand; but [b]few of us desire to do so[/b] or know how …

Another important case where this applies can be found when jFET’s are used as voltage-controlled-resistors (VCR’s) as used in Phase Shifters and AGC/compressors. Unbeknownst to most peeps, there lies a great benefit in using properly and accurately matched devices. In fact, there is a strong potential for extended Phasor range when the matching is done to a high level of accuracy (ie., at +/-10mV resolution). More on this later …

http://www.vishay.com/docs/70598/70598.pdf

It is important to know that unlike their BJT counterparts jFET’s differ in specs according to a random 2-dimensional variance (see accompanying plot below) // in particular, any method that collapses that relationship into a single number will obviously be wrong by nature. An example of the later approach (blindly borrowed from BJT testing methods, and used by many to this day) will be analyzed and presented on this blog shortly …

To obtain accurate characteristic pair values a multi-tester approach is used, one where the Drain-to-Source voltage is held constant during all measurement phases; a voltage chosen to lie well into the pinch-off region for that device (ie., well above the maximum listed value for |Vp|). For my lots of 2n5457 devices I chose a test voltage of 7.50 volts, as |Vp|max = 6 volts.

Three pairs of data points are extracted per device, one for Idss (at Vgs=0), one near cut-off (at Id=10uA) and a mid-point value (somewhere between Idss/3 and Idss/2) … from this 3-point data a good estimate for Vgs(off) can be derived … leaving us with a numerical characterization pair (Idss@7.50v and Vp) for each device … if all devices are tested at the same reference voltage then these two numbers can be used to establish a strong basis for matching. Assuming matched characteristics throughout the hole transfer range of two devices for which Vgs(off) and Idss@7.50 values coincide closely.

jFETs1JCM2015

jFETs2JCM2015

jFETs3JCM2015

jFETs4JCM2015

jFETs5JCM2015

IN case you’re wondering, Temperature does not factor in jFET testing as much as it does with BJT’s. I’m not sure, but I think this is because the forward-biased diode junction in a BJT is strongly dependent on temperature, firstly, whereas in a jFET this junction is reversed biased and so temperature plays a secondary role in the device’s behavior … indeed, touching the jFET with fingers during testing does not cause a strong migration of readings like it does with BJT’s, and so the testing can be done reliably without requiring a temperature controlled forced-air system.

Below, we can see what my three un-related lots of 2n5457’s look like all graphed out once characterized … notice, all values are found lying well within the rated limits for the 2n5457 device: 1mA < Idss < 5mA and -6v < Vp < -0.5v (see datasheet) 2n5457VpIdssJCM2015

The following two pdf files demonstrates the methodology and provides tabulated results. In a total of 250 or so devices, we find very few “perfect” matches if we use +/-10mV as a benchmark … at +/-20mV (using adjacent Vp values) the choice gets a little better, but still this study shows that even with so many devices the likely-hood of good matching is actually quite poor considering the spread of potential values / not a surprise, and something that “adds” to the jFET’s ill reputation

if researchers were to characterize their 2n5457 devices, say, using the same technique and parameters then the possibility of trading devices for obtaining matched sets becomes a reality

jFETQuadraticModeling-DataJCM2015.pdf

2n5457VpIdssJCM2015.pdf

As far as sets go, we find the presence of 9 closely-matched QUADS in the following range: -1.49v < Vgs(off) <-1.38v of the data ... and of course, many more triplets (underlined) or pairs ... that is, those devices for which Vgs(off) is an identical estimated number and Idss@(-7.50v) are the closest to east other - ie., well within 10% from each other ...


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

360+ Pro Fuzz/Preamp

360+ProButton

360+ DIY Kit

360+diyKitButton

Mu3 DIY Kit

360+ProButton

IFMTA (book)

FWboard-Button

IFMTA (PDF)

FWboard-Button

Champ (PDF)

uChampButton